Reversing the Rabbi’s Rule
Is anyone out there who does not know about the Rabbi’s Rule? Here is an unusual example from the Silodor Pairs where it was a defender who took advantage of the situation:
Dealer: North
Vul: None |
North | ||||
♠ | 9 5 4 | ||||
♥ | A Q 7 6 3 | ||||
♦ | J 10 5 2 | ||||
♣ | K | ||||
West | East | ||||
♠ | A K Q 8 | ♠ | 7 2 | ||
♥ | K J | ♥ | 10 9 8 4 2 | ||
♦ | 7 | ♦ | L Q 9 4 | ||
♣ | A 9 8 6 5 3 | ♣ | 10 2 | ||
South | |||||
♠ | J 10 6 3 | ||||
♥ | 5 | ||||
♦ | A 6 4 3 | ||||
♣ | Q J 7 4 |
West | North: Horton | East | South: Helman |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
1♣ | 1♥ | Pass | Pass |
1♠ | Pass | 1NT | Pass |
2NT | All Pass |
The Rabbi led the five of hearts and declarer put up dummy’s king which lost to the ace. To the human eye it looks obvious to switch to a diamond (although my finessing friend tells me that a spade is the best defence). I have a sneaking suspicion that a low diamond is the best shot but just in case I tried the jack of diamonds, covered by the king and ace.
The Rabbi returned the three of diamonds and with some foreboding I contributed the ten which declarer won with the queen. He continued with a heart to the jack and I won with the queen.
Rather than play a diamond I decided to reverse the Rabbi’s Rule and tried the effect of playing the king of clubs.
When declarer ducked I exited with a spade. Seeing no danger declarer now played a low club and the Rabbi was able to win with the jack and exit with a spade, locking declarer in dummy and ensuring one more trick for the defence.
Not a spectacular number of matchpoints for N/S, but the sort of average plus board you need to keep your score ticking along.