Misbid (some of) these Hands with Me
There is no doubt that slam bidding is one of the most testing areas of the game, even for experienced partnerships. Here are a few adventures from the final of the BAM teams:
Dealer: East
Vul: East/West |
North | ||||
♠ | – | ||||
♥ | J 10 8 4 | ||||
♦ | A Q 9 8 4 | ||||
♣ | A 7 5 2 | ||||
West | East | ||||
♠ | K Q 9 5 4 2 | ♠ | A 10 8 7 6 | ||
♥ | Q 9 5 3 | ♥ | K 2 | ||
♦ | 10 5 | ♦ | K J 7 6 2 | ||
♣ | 10 | ♣ | K Q 6 | ||
South | |||||
♠ | J 3 | ||||
♥ | A 7 6 | ||||
♦ | K J 7 6 2 | ||||
♣ | K Q 6 |
West | North | East | South |
Horton | Helman | ||
Pass | 1♦ | ||
2♠ | Dble | 4♠ | Pass |
Pass | 6♦ | All Pass |
With E/W competing so vigorously in spades all South’s high cards rated to be useful, hence the jump to 6♦.
On a spade lead declarer ruffs, draws trumps, plays four rounds of clubs, ruffing when the suit fails to divide and then ruffs a spade. Now, with West counted for a 6-4-2-1 distribution declarer plays the jack of hearts from dummy, running it if East plays low. When West wins and returns a heart declarer has a decision to make, but should probably get it right.
Dealer: East
Vul: All |
North | ||||
♠ | A Q 9 | ||||
♥ | Q | ||||
♦ | A Q 7 5 | ||||
♣ | A Q 8 7 6 | ||||
West | East | ||||
♠ | K 5 | ♠ | J 8 4 3 | ||
♥ | 10 8 5 4 3 | ♥ | A K J 9 2 | ||
♦ | 10 4 3 | ♦ | – | ||
♣ | K 10 3 | ♣ | 9 5 4 2 | ||
South | |||||
♠ | 10 7 6 2 | ||||
♥ | 7 6 | ||||
♦ | K J 9 8 6 2 | ||||
♣ | J |
West | North | East | South |
Alder | Helman | ||
Pass | Pass | ||
Pass | 1♣ | 1♥ | 2♦ |
3♥ | 4NT* | Pass | 5♣ * |
Pass | 6♦ | All Pass |
The scientific approach would be for North to bid 4♥ over 3♥ , hoping South could produce a black suit cue bid, but 4NT was an understandable alternative.
With the king of spades onside this contract cannot be defeated.
West | North | East | South |
van Cleeff | Kendrick | ||
1♥ | Pass | ||
4♥ | Dble | Pass | 4♠ |
All Pass |
East/West’s activity saw North/South reach a delicate contract. 4♠ can be made, but declarer lost his way and finished one down.
|
||
Dealer: West | ||
|
||
South | ||
♠ | A J 10 | |
♥ | J 7 4 3 | |
♦ | A 3 | |
♣ | A K 7 5 |
You have the South cards and we can treat this as a two part problem. First, what do you do if West passes and your partner opens 3♥ ?
Second, suppose the opening bid is 4♥ ?
In the first case there is no real reason to do more than raise to game, as for a slam to be good you probably need partner to not only have very good trumps – say ♥ AKxxxxx – but also a second round diamond control.
In the second case you might simply jump to 6♥ , but there must be some risk (and there are others) that a diamond lead will be awkward unless partner has a control in that suit. One way to find out is to bid 5♣ over 4♥ . That asks partner to cue bid a first round diamond control, or jump to 6♥ with a second round control.
If you wanted a spade control you would bid 5♦ over 4♥ – once again bidding the suit below the one that you need partner to control.
However, this is not a perfect solution, as if partner has ♥ AKxxxxxx and two small diamonds you clearly want to be in 6♥ , but give South two small diamonds and this neat convention may be the only way to reach a laydown slam.
On this occasion as you will see when I reveal the full deal, anything other than 4♥ is too high if East leads a diamond:
North | |||||
♠ | 7 6 | ||||
♥ | K Q 10 9 6 5 2 | ||||
♦ | 7 5 | ||||
♣ | 4 2 | ||||
West | East | ||||
♠ | K 5 3 | ♠ | Q 9 8 4 2 | ||
♥ | 8 | ♥ | A | ||
♦ | K 8 6 4 2 | ♦ | Q J 10 9 | ||
♣ | Q 8 6 3 | ♣ | J 10 9 | ||
South | |||||
♠ | A J 10 | ||||
♥ | J 7 4 3 | ||||
♦ | A 3 | ||||
♣ | A K 7 5 |